Raincross Financial Partners

You are currently viewing Review Your Beneficiary Designations

Review Your Beneficiary Designations

Failure To Designate Beneficiaries Can Sabotage Estate Plans

August 23, 2021

Even after a pandemic heightened awareness of the importance of naming beneficiaries for estate planning, some clients still might not understand or pay attention to how critical these designations are.

“Clients misunderstand, overlook and even ignore beneficiary designations,” said Benjamin Bohlmann of Friedman LLP in Miami, adding that he’s “no longer surprised at finding an ex-spouse listed as the primary beneficiary of a large life insurance policy. After the insured’s death, that’s a problem without a solution.”

A bad designation can cause tax and other trouble with numerous planning tools. “Listing ‘payable to my estate’ can have disastrous results, [such as] inclusion in a taxable estate and being distributed according to the decedent’s will rather than some other intended result,” he said.

“We find that as folks’ life circumstances change and shift, their beneficiary designations do not,” said Katelyn Murray, a CFP at Kendall Capital in Rockville, Md. “In addition to updating your beneficiary on file for your accounts as a result of the death of beneficiaries, divorce or new children who are born—just to name a few instances—we have a standard practice of reviewing our clients’ beneficiaries on file every two or three years.”

“It’s not that clients have a misconception about beneficiary designations. It’s that they tend to name beneficiaries and then don’t change them when their beneficiary designation no longer reflects their wishes,” said Karen L. Goldberg, partner-in-charge of EisnerAmper’s Trusts and Estates Group in New York.

“Many mistakenly believe that their last will and testament will direct where their assets go after they pass away. This is only true for probate assets,” added Robert Polans, a CPA at Drucker & Scaccetti in Philadelphia.

The wisdom of beneficiary designations can vary by type of asset. Such non-probate assets as qualified retirement plan assets, traditional and Roth IRAs, tax-deferred annuities, life insurance policies and assets within most inter-vivos trusts are directed only by a beneficiary designation.

“If you will leave behind significant non-probate assets including retirement accounts, also consider as part of your overall estate plan whether these assets should be directed into trusts to benefit your beneficiaries,” Polans said. “Trusts can provide a level of asset protection, including protecting a beneficiary’s inheritance from litigation or creditors, divorce proceedings, from reckless spending habits or from poor investment decisions by the beneficiary. Trusts can also keep assets within the family if a beneficiary dies prematurely.”

Bohlman said, “We stress to clients that life insurance proceeds, gifts and bequests escape federal income taxation in the hands of the recipients. The key is to avoid missteps and traps – inclusion in a taxable estate, not qualifying for the annual gift exclusion. Non-tax factors are closely linked to tax factors: lack of liquidity in an estate, bequests that may be lost to a beneficiary’s creditors, having to go through probate.”

Designations can be key from a tax perspective for, say, retirement plans. If the spouse is the beneficiary, the plan won’t incur estate tax taxable until the surviving spouse’s death, and he or she can take distributions over their remaining life expectancy after the required age.

Said Goldberg, “If a surviving spouse is not the beneficiary, the plan will be subject to estate tax and the beneficiary will generally be required to withdraw the plan funds within 10 years.”

Health savings accounts (HSAs) are becoming more popular as long-term savings vehicles due to their triple-tax advantage, Murray added, but are inefficient for passing wealth to non-spouse beneficiaries.

And sometimes with beneficiaries, clients defeat their own deepest intentions.

“A client with three children will often default to listing all three children as equal beneficiaries on each one of her accounts because this looks logical, neat and fair,” Murray said. But factors to consider in this scenario, she added, include beneficiaries’ current and future tax rates and the mandatory withdrawal rates of pre-tax and taxable retirement accounts.

“If there’s income disparity between those beneficiaries,” she said, “we have an opportunity to think more strategically about who to list as a beneficiary on which type of account, while still being fair.”

Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions or services of  Jeff Stimpson
This information, developed by an independent third party, has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. This information is not intended as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security referred to herein. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. The material is general in nature. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Raymond James does not provide advice on tax, legal or mortgage issues. These matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional.